|
| Re: Nested functions |
 |
Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:55:10 +000 |
Often times when I am optimizing a script I will replace a for loop with a
mapped function. I leave those inline for readabilities sake.
<Stokes> wrote in message news:5725890@discussion.autodesk.com...
Is it a significant efficiency hit to define a 'private' function within
another function? Does every call to the parent function redefine the nested
one?
I originally tried doing this as an experiment, but I've since noticed
functions-within-functions like this being done in some of the utility
scripts that ship with 3dsmax.
If they don't pose a significant problem, they are a tidy way to convert
functions that iterate over an array into mapped functions.
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|