|
| Outline size differences |
 |
Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:55:56 -070 |
I recently had the following occurrence and am looking for information.
I was finalizing a Quark v6.1 doc for printing at a commercial press after the
doc was transferred to me from editorial. Fonts loaded fine and there were no
flags. I made a PDF of the doc and printed it on our postscript laser printer;
again, no font problems or flags. Comparing the pages I printed from PDF to the
proof pages I was given by editorial, printed from Quark, I noticed that after
about 50 pages the text had reflowed. I went compared the fonts I had loaded
with the fonts that came with the job and found that they were all identical in
version (and, of course, publisher) except that one loaded font had a different
"outline size" than the font which came with the job (i.e., an outline
size of 34772 rather than 34773). When I switched this one font, the text flow
on the two sets of pages became identical.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Outline size differences |
 |
Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:08:07 -070 |
You don't say explicitly, but I'm going to assume from your mention of
"outline size" that you are using a Type 1 font (a.k.a.
"PostScript"), and that the "outline size" is the size of
the LWFN file, the scalable font outlines, which are a separate file from the
font suitcase. Assuming all that is true....
No, outline size is independent of kerning. But the different outline size is a
suggestion that there is something different between the fonts. Somebody could
have modified a font without changing the version string, for example. Also, the
base character widths are present in the outline font (and also in the suitcase,
if memory serves).
Regards,
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|