|
| Turbo C++ is same performance with Microsoft Visual C++ ? |
 |
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:25:59 +030 |
Turbo C++ is same performance with Microsoft Visual C++ ?
Thanx
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Turbo C++ is same performance with Microsoft Visual C++ ? |
 |
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:22:21 +020 |
Asking wrote:
> Turbo C++ is same performance with Microsoft Visual C++ ?
In math library, graphics library.. for what??
And for what operating system? DOS or Windows?
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: In math and graphics library for Windows Application ? and... |
 |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:18:40 -070 |
Asking wrote:
> Turbo C++ is same performance with Microsoft Visual C++ ?
>In math and graphics library for Windows Application ?
>
>I'll write a 3D modelling program such as Catia, Rhino3d etc. I'm trying to
>decide between Microsoft Visual C++ and Turbo C++.
And is that the old Turbo C++ that is the topic of this group, or the
new Turbo C++ Explorer/Pro version, which is based on the Builder
series, (currently known as BDS), which would be on-topic in forums
containing the word "cppbuilder" ?
If you are asking about the latest version, I would suggest
b.p.cppbuilder.non-technical
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: I see... My question is about new Turbo C++ Explorer/Pro version and Ms.Visual C++ 2005. |
 |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:13:06 -070 |
Asking wrote:
>I see... My question is about new Turbo C++ Explorer/Pro version and
>Ms.Visual C++ 2005.
Then,as I mentioned, asking in b.p.cppbuilder.non-technical will get
you better answers.
|
| Post Reply
|
| In math and graphics library for Windows Application ? and... |
 |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:13:43 +030 |
In math and graphics library for Windows Application ?
I'll write a 3D modelling program such as Catia, Rhino3d etc. I'm trying to
decide between Microsoft Visual C++ and Turbo C++.
Thank you again
"Asking" <asking@ispro.net.tr> wrote in message
news:4533a486@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Turbo C++ is same performance with Microsoft Visual C++ ?
>
> Thanx
>
>
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|