|
| Re: resize in mass?? |
 |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:35:54 -070 |
"L.S." <notgood@notgood.com> wrote in news:478a4928_3@cnews:
> I've made a Boundscript that resizes(I think) to what I need, 3"
depth.
> How do I "select" or change all the photos at one time?
>
> As stated before, I read how to do this just can't remember.
>
You have to go to Help>Automating Tasks>Processing Multiple Images. That
will explain batch processing for you.
Regards,
JoeB
|
| Post Reply
|
| resize in mass?? |
 |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:11:18 -060 |
Have a folder with 68 photos from digital camera.
They are all ~ 600 KB, 28"w x 21"h.
I'd like to resize all to ~ XX"w x 3"h..
Is there a way to resize in mass?
I thought I read somewhere that you can do this using scripts and/or
thumbnails but don't remember how.
thanks,
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: resize in mass?? |
 |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:15:56 -060 |
Folowup.
Found how to change size using Thumbnail150 script but I'd like to make the
height a standard size instead of width.
"L.S." <notgood@notgood.com> wrote in message
news:478a45cb$1_1@cnews...
>
> Have a folder with 68 photos from digital camera.
> They are all ~ 600 KB, 28"w x 21"h.
> I'd like to resize all to ~ XX"w x 3"h..
>
> Is there a way to resize in mass?
> I thought I read somewhere that you can do this using scripts and/or
> thumbnails but don't remember how.
>
> thanks,
>
>
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: resize in mass?? |
 |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:25:38 -060 |
"Trev" <trevbowden@dsl.pipex.cominvalid> wrote in message
news:478a47d9_3@cnews...
>
> L.S. wrote:
>> Folowup.
>> Found how to change size using Thumbnail150 script but I'd like to
>> make the height a standard size instead of width.
>>
>>
>> "L.S." <notgood@notgood.com> wrote in message
>> news:478a45cb$1_1@cnews...
>>>
>>> Have a folder with 68 photos from digital camera.
>>> They are all ~ 600 KB, 28"w x 21"h.
>>> I'd like to resize all to ~ XX"w x 3"h..
>>>
>>> Is there a way to resize in mass?
>>> I thought I read somewhere that you can do this using scripts
and/or
>>> thumbnails but don't remember how.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>
> It Sets the largest side So that it works on portraits and Landscape
> images
>
> --
> Trev
> You can always tell a Yorkshire man,
> But you can't tell him much.
>
I've made a Boundscript that resizes(I think) to what I need, 3" depth.
How do I "select" or change all the photos at one time?
As stated before, I read how to do this just can't remember.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: resize in mass?? |
 |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:46:51 -060 |
Will reply to both.
Batch-that's it. Got it.
Here's what we're doing and another problem/situation has come up.
The photos are for inventory and informational control for items in our
local Historical Society.
The pics don't have to be of any quality. In fact, printing fast, B&W.
We're inserting the pics into a Word doc that has been formatted so we can
add information about the item and save for reference only.
Resized all pics to ~4"h x 3"w. (batch)
Inserting one at a into the Word doc.
When I insert, the pics come out 2.25"h x 3"w instead of 4"
x3".
This is not a mayor deal as long as size stays constant but wondering WHY
size is changing?
"Trev" <trevbowden@dsl.pipex.cominvalid> wrote in message
news:478a4ac4_2@cnews...
>
> L.S. wrote:
>> Folowup.
>> Found how to change size using Thumbnail150 script but I'd like to
>> make the height a standard size instead of width.
>>
>>
>> "L.S." <notgood@notgood.com> wrote in message
>> news:478a45cb$1_1@cnews...
>>>
>>> Have a folder with 68 photos from digital camera.
>>> They are all ~ 600 KB, 28"w x 21"h.
>>> I'd like to resize all to ~ XX"w x 3"h..
>>>
>>> Is there a way to resize in mass?
>>> I thought I read somewhere that you can do this using scripts
and/or
>>> thumbnails but don't remember how.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>
> Then again I dont think you want to resize just Change the ppi to get your
> new size. Inches only come in to the equation when printing. Looking at
> your 28" wide by 21" high that will be at 72 ppi making the
images 2016
> pixels by 1512 pixels So If you change the ppi with out resampling like
> 1512 pixel high at 500 pixels per inch you get 3.024" high by 4.032
" and
> you have not lost any detail in your images
>
> --
> Trev
> You can always tell a Yorkshire man,
> But you can't tell him much.
>
>
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|