Groups > Corel > Corel PhotoPaing X3 > Re: Back to square one on histograms




Back to square one on histograms

Back to square one on histograms
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:24:38 -050
Hi Everybody,
  Tell me if I have this straight.
1.  I have a full gradient with tone values from 0 to 255.
2,  I compress this - one way or another - to a spread from a tone value of 
32 to a tone value of 64.
3.  I  now have only 64 tone values because granularity can only be in 
integers.
4.  I expand - one way or another - to tones from 0 to 255.
5.   The expansion does NOT fill in missing tone values.
6.  The resulting expansion has only 64 tone values.
7.  Thus 3 out of 4 of the original tone values are not present.
   Is this correct.
Phil 


Post Reply
Re: Back to square one on histograms
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:05:55 -050
YES!

-- 
Alfred
http://www.alfredky.com
"Philip K" <PhilipK@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4792bec3_2@cnews...
>
> Hi Everybody,
>  Tell me if I have this straight.
> 1.  I have a full gradient with tone values from 0 to 255.
> 2,  I compress this - one way or another - to a spread from a tone value 
> of 32 to a tone value of 64.
> 3.  I  now have only 64 tone values because granularity can only be in 
> integers.
> 4.  I expand - one way or another - to tones from 0 to 255.
> 5.   The expansion does NOT fill in missing tone values.
> 6.  The resulting expansion has only 64 tone values.
> 7.  Thus 3 out of 4 of the original tone values are not present.
>   Is this correct.
> Phil
>
> 


Post Reply
Re: Back to square one on histograms
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:08:36 -050
If you spread the tone values from 32 to 64, you will have a total of 64 
values, but the will have the observed spaces..

-- 
Alfred
http://www.alfredky.com
"Gareth Hawker"
<gareth@_removethis.bit_garethhawker.freeserve.co.uk> wrote 
in message news:47933672$1_1@cnews...
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> That all makes sense to me (except that I think a spread from 32 to 64 
> would
> leave a total of 32, not 64).
>
> Regards
>
> Gareth> Hi Everybody,
>>  Tell me if I have this straight.
>> 1.  I have a full gradient with tone values from 0 to 255.
>> 2,  I compress this - one way or another - to a spread from a tone
value 
>> of 32 to a tone value of 64.
>> 3.  I  now have only 64 tone values because granularity can only be in

>> integers.
>> 4.  I expand - one way or another - to tones from 0 to 255.
>> 5.   The expansion does NOT fill in missing tone values.
>> 6.  The resulting expansion has only 64 tone values.
>> 7.  Thus 3 out of 4 of the original tone values are not present.
>>   Is this correct.
>> Phil
>>
>>
>
>
> 


Post Reply
Re: Back to square one on histograms
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:50:33 -000
Hi Phil,

That all makes sense to me (except that I think a spread from 32 to 64 would 
leave a total of 32, not 64).

Regards

Gareth


> Hi Everybody,
>  Tell me if I have this straight.
> 1.  I have a full gradient with tone values from 0 to 255.
> 2,  I compress this - one way or another - to a spread from a tone value 
> of 32 to a tone value of 64.
> 3.  I  now have only 64 tone values because granularity can only be in 
> integers.
> 4.  I expand - one way or another - to tones from 0 to 255.
> 5.   The expansion does NOT fill in missing tone values.
> 6.  The resulting expansion has only 64 tone values.
> 7.  Thus 3 out of 4 of the original tone values are not present.
>   Is this correct.
> Phil
>
> 


Post Reply
Re: Back to square one on histograms
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:55:11 -000
Hi Phil,

That all makes sense to me (except that I think a spread from 32 to 64 would
leave a total of 32, not 64).

Regards

Gareth> Hi Everybody,
>  Tell me if I have this straight.
> 1.  I have a full gradient with tone values from 0 to 255.
> 2,  I compress this - one way or another - to a spread from a tone value 
> of 32 to a tone value of 64.
> 3.  I  now have only 64 tone values because granularity can only be in 
> integers.
> 4.  I expand - one way or another - to tones from 0 to 255.
> 5.   The expansion does NOT fill in missing tone values.
> 6.  The resulting expansion has only 64 tone values.
> 7.  Thus 3 out of 4 of the original tone values are not present.
>   Is this correct.
> Phil
>
> 


Post Reply
<< Previous 1 2 Next >>
( Page 1 of 2 )
about | contact