|
| IBM Directory server changelog connector - question. |
 |
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:26:14 -050 |
Hi - we're porting code over from 5.2 to 6.1.1 With 6.1.1 (we're not on
any of the FixPacks yet) I have noticed unusual bahaviour with one of
our IDS changelog connectors. In the AL, the iteration stops and then
finishes within milliseconds - it is not waiting for the "timeout" of
10
seconds.
However, within the same AL, if I set aside the old changelog connector
and create a new changelog connector with the same parameters on the
GUI, I can get it to behave as expected.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: IBM Directory server changelog connector - question. |
 |
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:48:29 -050 |
Thanks Eddie - I will open up a PMR in the next hour or two. I have now
seen this happen in two of our environments.
Eddie Hartman wrote:
> Hi, Derryck,
>
> Definitely sounds like something you should speak with
> support about.
>
> Also, if you take a look at the Config xml itself, searching
> until you find your changelog Connector (under the <AssemblyLine>
> node which will sort under <Folders name="AssemblyLines">)
> you will probably see some differences in the parameter settings.
> Bring these along (5.2 and 6.1.1 converted Configs) when you
> contact our L2 wizards.
>
> It could also be that all you really need is fp2
>
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=697&context=SSCQGF&dc=D400&a
mp;uid=swg24017390&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en
>
>
> -Eddie
>
> Derryck Lamptey wrote:
>
>> Hi - we're porting code over from 5.2 to 6.1.1 With 6.1.1 (we're not
>> on any of the FixPacks yet) I have noticed unusual bahaviour with one
>> of our IDS changelog connectors. In the AL, the iteration stops and
>> then finishes within milliseconds - it is not waiting for the
>> "timeout" of 10 seconds.
>> However, within the same AL, if I set aside the old changelog
>> connector and create a new changelog connector with the same
>> parameters on the GUI, I can get it to behave as expected.
>>
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: IBM Directory server changelog connector - question. |
 |
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:44:07 +010 |
Hi, Derryck,
Definitely sounds like something you should speak with
support about.
Also, if you take a look at the Config xml itself, searching
until you find your changelog Connector (under the <AssemblyLine>
node which will sort under <Folders name="AssemblyLines">)
you will probably see some differences in the parameter settings.
Bring these along (5.2 and 6.1.1 converted Configs) when you
contact our L2 wizards.
It could also be that all you really need is fp2
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=697&context=SSCQGF&dc=D400&a
mp;uid=swg24017390&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en
-Eddie
Derryck Lamptey wrote:
> Hi - we're porting code over from 5.2 to 6.1.1 With 6.1.1 (we're not on
> any of the FixPacks yet) I have noticed unusual bahaviour with one of
> our IDS changelog connectors. In the AL, the iteration stops and then
> finishes within milliseconds - it is not waiting for the
"timeout" of 10
> seconds.
> However, within the same AL, if I set aside the old changelog connector
> and create a new changelog connector with the same parameters on the
> GUI, I can get it to behave as expected.
>
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: IBM Directory server changelog connector - question. |
 |
Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:18:33 -050 |
Nearly at closeout on this. We opened up a PMR, and finally pinpointed
the issue as being related to the new behaviour of (interplay between)
the Timeout/Sleep parameter. A level 2 (Brian) pointed us to a technote
called "TDS Changelog connector Timeout and Sleep Interval behavior
change" which explains the situation.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=697&context=SSCQGF&dc=DB520&
amp;dc=DB560&uid=swg21270924&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en&rss=
ct697tivoli
epilogue: We are retrofitting all our code with the timeout value being
more than the sleep value on all our changelog-dependent iterators, in
all our environments.
epi-epilogue: one of the puzzling aspects of this issue was that in one
of our environments, ITDI 6.1.1 (no FP) was working fine even though the
sleep/timeout values could be expected to not work (according to the
note). In our other two environments, the same timeout values did not
work, and had to be fixed according to the technote.
Derryck Lamptey wrote:
> Thanks Eddie - I will open up a PMR in the next hour or two. I have now
> seen this happen in two of our environments.
>
> Eddie Hartman wrote:
>> Hi, Derryck,
>>
>> Definitely sounds like something you should speak with
>> support about.
>>
>> Also, if you take a look at the Config xml itself, searching
>> until you find your changelog Connector (under the
<AssemblyLine>
>> node which will sort under <Folders
name="AssemblyLines">)
>> you will probably see some differences in the parameter settings.
>> Bring these along (5.2 and 6.1.1 converted Configs) when you
>> contact our L2 wizards.
>>
>> It could also be that all you really need is fp2
>>
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=697&context=SSCQGF&dc=D400&a
mp;uid=swg24017390&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en
>>
>>
>> -Eddie
>>
>> Derryck Lamptey wrote:
>>
>>> Hi - we're porting code over from 5.2 to 6.1.1 With 6.1.1 (we're
not
>>> on any of the FixPacks yet) I have noticed unusual bahaviour with
one
>>> of our IDS changelog connectors. In the AL, the iteration stops and
>>> then finishes within milliseconds - it is not waiting for the
>>> "timeout" of 10 seconds.
>>> However, within the same AL, if I set aside the old changelog
>>> connector and create a new changelog connector with the same
>>> parameters on the GUI, I can get it to behave as expected.
>>>
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|