|
| web page could not be saved [as web archive] |
 |
Thu, 3 Apr 2008 02:18:37 -0500 |
Saving in MHTML format fails for many pages, including Microsoft's own
KB such as http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321232. Google wisdom points
to the MS02-023 security update, and I don't see a choice to uninstall
that under XP Sp2.
Is there a particular combination of (looser) security settings to
restore the save-as-MHT functionality to its (maybe less secure, but at
least working) pre-MS02-023 state? Any insight much appreciated.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: web page could not be saved [as web archive] |
 |
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:51:03 -0500 |
"Liviu" <lab2k1@gmail.c0m> wrote in message
news:OxdedsVlIHA.5820@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> Saving in MHTML format fails for many pages, including Microsoft's own
> KB such as http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321232. Google wisdom
> points to the MS02-023 security update, and I don't see a choice to
> uninstall that under XP Sp2.
>
> Is there a particular combination of (looser) security settings to
> restore the save-as-MHT functionality to its (maybe less secure, but
> at least working) pre-MS02-023 state? Any insight much appreciated.
P.S. Among the handful of older posts on this topic, one (+) says...
|| I note that you can set the security level for "Internet" sites to
|| allow transfers accross domains. This works for BBC, but not CNN..
The two sites in question work nowadays without any client-side tweaks.
Anyone has an example of another/current webpage where that security
setting makes any difference at all (as far as save-as-mht)?
(+)
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser
/browse_frm/thread/da86f81481455506/1f6a9d8beca3f4c7
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: web page could not be saved [as web archive] |
 |
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:00:21 -0400 |
"Liviu" <lab2k1@gmail.c0m> wrote in message
news:OxdedsVlIHA.5820@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Saving in MHTML format fails for many pages, including Microsoft's own
> KB such as http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321232.
FWIW IE8b1 can save that page. (File, Save As...)
For IE6 and saving KB articles I can remember that something used to happen
when saving as .mht. A workaround then was using File, Send, Page by E-mail
then saving the E-mail as .mht (if desired).
---
> Google wisdom points
> to the MS02-023 security update, and I don't see a choice to uninstall
> that under XP Sp2.
>
> Is there a particular combination of (looser) security settings to
> restore the save-as-MHT functionality to its (maybe less secure, but at
> least working) pre-MS02-023 state? Any insight much appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: web page could not be saved [as web archive] |
 |
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:17:35 -0500 |
"Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@techemail.com> wrote in message
news:%23exBIramIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "Liviu" <lab2k1@gmail.c0m> wrote in message
> news:OxdedsVlIHA.5820@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>
>> Saving in MHTML format fails for many pages, including Microsoft's
>> own KB such as http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321232.
>
> FWIW IE8b1 can save that page. (File, Save As...)
>
> For IE6 and saving KB articles I can remember that something used to
> happen when saving as .mht. A workaround then was using File,
> Send, Page by E-mail then saving the E-mail as .mht (if desired).
Thanks for the IE8 tip, though I don't see that in my near future ;-)
FWIW IE6's save-as-mht used to work until some "security fix" broke
it.
The send-page-by-email-then-save-email-as-mht trick still works. That
security hole might have not been so critical after all, since MS didn't
bother to "fix" it in OE, too.
I find it ridiculous, though not unheard of, that (a) crippling a useful
and legit feature is proudly labeled a "fix", and (b) the
"fix" is
forced upon previously working IE6 versions without an opt-out..
> ---
>
>> Google wisdom points
>> to the MS02-023 security update, and I don't see a choice to
>> uninstall
>> that under XP Sp2.
>>
>> Is there a particular combination of (looser) security settings to
>> restore the save-as-MHT functionality to its (maybe less secure, but
>> at
>> least working) pre-MS02-023 state? Any insight much appreciated.
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|