|
| About NAV and SBS 2003 |
 |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:27:04 +010 |
Hello,
I searching for somebody who had ever experience with SBS2003 as server of
NAV.
Does it work without any trouble ?
Is there some special features which need to be control ?
... your help is welcome
--
Salutations
Titag
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: About NAV and SBS 2003 |
 |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:30:16 -000 |
Main issue we found was performance. SBS2003 usually runs as your Domain
Controller AND Exchange AND Firewall so to stick SQL in the mix and
attempting to run Nav, you're unlikely to get decent performance.
--
From: Drew Sharkey
"Vincent Mantor" <mantor_5@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4CB48233-AC2A-454A-BEC5-C0F1A771BDA1@microsoft.com...
> Hello,
>
> I searching for somebody who had ever experience with SBS2003 as server of
> NAV.
> Does it work without any trouble ?
> Is there some special features which need to be control ?
> ... your help is welcome
>
> --
> Salutations
> Titag
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: About NAV and SBS 2003 |
 |
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:41:27 +010 |
Hello Drew,
Why "unlikely to get decent performance" ?
Sql is coming from SBS too ! (Premium version).
--
Salutations
Vincent Mantor
"Drew Sharkey" <drew@mission.demon.co.uk> a écrit dans le
message de
news:%23$NDJcrjIHA.5412@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Main issue we found was performance. SBS2003 usually runs as your Domain
> Controller AND Exchange AND Firewall so to stick SQL in the mix and
> attempting to run Nav, you're unlikely to get decent performance.
>
>
> --
>
> From: Drew Sharkey
> "Vincent Mantor" <mantor_5@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4CB48233-AC2A-454A-BEC5-C0F1A771BDA1@microsoft.com...
>> Hello,
>>
>> I searching for somebody who had ever experience with SBS2003 as server
>> of NAV.
>> Does it work without any trouble ?
>> Is there some special features which need to be control ?
>> ... your help is welcome
>>
>> --
>> Salutations
>> Titag
>
>
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: About NAV and SBS 2003 |
 |
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:19:59 -000 |
Exactly. Both SQL and Exchange say to themselves "I'm going to grab all
available resources for my own purposes". As they are on the same server,
they will be in a constant fight for memory & processor resources and, in my
experience (we tried to run Navision on SBS2003 at the start), Exchange
usually wins. We very quickly realised that we needed a dedicated SQL
server to run our Navision installation and left SBS2003 to handle exchange
and domain control.
--
From: Drew Sharkey
"Vincent Mantor" <mantor_5@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:756694FD-0301-4FFE-A967-388779CB2B41@microsoft.com...
> Hello Drew,
>
> Why "unlikely to get decent performance" ?
> Sql is coming from SBS too ! (Premium version).
>
> --
> Salutations
> Vincent Mantor
> "Drew Sharkey" <drew@mission.demon.co.uk> a écrit dans le
message de
> news:%23$NDJcrjIHA.5412@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Main issue we found was performance. SBS2003 usually runs as your
Domain
>> Controller AND Exchange AND Firewall so to stick SQL in the mix and
>> attempting to run Nav, you're unlikely to get decent performance.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> From: Drew Sharkey
>> "Vincent Mantor" <mantor_5@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
>> news:4CB48233-AC2A-454A-BEC5-C0F1A771BDA1@microsoft.com...
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I searching for somebody who had ever experience with SBS2003 as
server
>>> of NAV.
>>> Does it work without any trouble ?
>>> Is there some special features which need to be control ?
>>> ... your help is welcome
>>>
>>> --
>>> Salutations
>>> Titag
>>
>>
>
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: About NAV and SBS 2003 |
 |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:30:07 +010 |
Thanks for your answer.
What was the version of NAV, SQL and SBS2003 at this time ?
What was your configuration (processor, memory,...) ?
Do you think it is possible to set the memory or to solve with a quad core
bi-processor server ?
It is for my experience and the cost of this operation we will have to do in
the future in my company.
Salutations.
--
Salutations
Vincent Mantor
"Drew Sharkey" <drew@mission.demon.co.uk> a écrit dans le
message de
news:ewyrJ%23DkIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Exactly. Both SQL and Exchange say to themselves "I'm going to grab
all
> available resources for my own purposes". As they are on the same
server,
> they will be in a constant fight for memory & processor resources and,
in
> my experience (we tried to run Navision on SBS2003 at the start), Exchange
> usually wins. We very quickly realised that we needed a dedicated SQL
> server to run our Navision installation and left SBS2003 to handle
> exchange and domain control.
>
>
> --
>
> From: Drew Sharkey
> "Vincent Mantor" <mantor_5@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:756694FD-0301-4FFE-A967-388779CB2B41@microsoft.com...
>> Hello Drew,
>>
>> Why "unlikely to get decent performance" ?
>> Sql is coming from SBS too ! (Premium version).
>>
>> --
>> Salutations
>> Vincent Mantor
>> "Drew Sharkey" <drew@mission.demon.co.uk> a écrit dans
le message de
>> news:%23$NDJcrjIHA.5412@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Main issue we found was performance. SBS2003 usually runs as your
>>> Domain Controller AND Exchange AND Firewall so to stick SQL in the
mix
>>> and attempting to run Nav, you're unlikely to get decent
performance.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> From: Drew Sharkey
>>> "Vincent Mantor" <mantor_5@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
>>> news:4CB48233-AC2A-454A-BEC5-C0F1A771BDA1@microsoft.com...
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I searching for somebody who had ever experience with SBS2003
as server
>>>> of NAV.
>>>> Does it work without any trouble ?
>>>> Is there some special features which need to be control ?
>>>> ... your help is welcome
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Salutations
>>>> Titag
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|