|
| wrong dates displayed on email but correct date stamped in header. |
 |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:14:05 -070 |
I have a few new products that I receive email from.
One is a Cisco ACS appliance and the other is a eFax.
Both send emails constantly but are dated 12/31/1969.
I opened the headers and the correct date is in the header.
Anyone know why these specific emails would display a different
date and time stamp in my email in box other than whats in the
header of the email. Here is an example of a good header.
Return-path: <smiller@costuless.com>
Received: from 10.10.210.11 by costuless.com (MDaemon PRO v9.0.1)
with ESMTP id md50000979531.msg for <smiller@costuless.com>; Tue, 27 Jun
2006 11:12:51 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
Subject:
To: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
X-HP-DIGITAL_SENDER: HP Digital Sender Service
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=cMc_xLc_8iL08i205U.41c67ea6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Processed: costuless.com, Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:51 -0700
(not processed: message size (36922) exceeds max size (25600))
X-MDRcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
X-Rcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
X-MDRemoteIP: 10.10.210.11
X-Return-Path: smiller@costuless.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: smiller@costuless.com
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: wrong dates displayed on email but correct date stamped in header. |
 |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:45:08 -070 |
Sean wrote:
> I have a few new products that I receive email from.
> One is a Cisco ACS appliance and the other is a eFax.
> Both send emails constantly but are dated 12/31/1969.
> I opened the headers and the correct date is in the header.
> Anyone know why these specific emails would display a different
> date and time stamp in my email in box other than whats in the
> header of the email. Here is an example of a good header.
>
> Return-path: <smiller@costuless.com>
>
> Received: from 10.10.210.11 by costuless.com (MDaemon PRO v9.0.1)
> with ESMTP id md50000979531.msg for <smiller@costuless.com>; Tue, 27
Jun
> 2006 11:12:51 -0700
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> From: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>
> Subject:
>
> To: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>
> X-HP-DIGITAL_SENDER: HP Digital Sender Service
>
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=cMc_xLc_8iL08i205U.41c67ea6"
>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> X-Spam-Processed: costuless.com, Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:51 -0700
> (not processed: message size (36922) exceeds max size (25600))
>
> X-MDRcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>
> X-Rcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>
> X-MDRemoteIP: 10.10.210.11
>
> X-Return-Path: smiller@costuless.com
>
> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: smiller@costuless.com
>
I would say go and complain to them and let them know whats going on.
--
Amazingly Simple Home Remedies . . .
If you are choking on an ice cube, don't panic! Simply pour a cup of
boiling water down your throat and presto! The blockage will be almost
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: wrong dates displayed on email but correct date stamped in header. |
 |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:03:49 +100 |
gwtc wrote:
> Sean wrote:
>> I have a few new products that I receive email from.
>> One is a Cisco ACS appliance and the other is a eFax.
>> Both send emails constantly but are dated 12/31/1969.
>> I opened the headers and the correct date is in the header.
>> Anyone know why these specific emails would display a different
>> date and time stamp in my email in box other than whats in the
>> header of the email. Here is an example of a good header.
>>
>> Return-path: <smiller@costuless.com>
>>
>> Received: from 10.10.210.11 by costuless.com (MDaemon PRO v9.0.1)
>> with ESMTP id md50000979531.msg for <smiller@costuless.com>; Tue,
27
>> Jun 2006 11:12:51 -0700
>>
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>
>> From: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>>
>> Subject:
>>
>> To: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>>
>> X-HP-DIGITAL_SENDER: HP Digital Sender Service
>>
>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>> boundary="=cMc_xLc_8iL08i205U.41c67ea6"
>>
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> X-Spam-Processed: costuless.com, Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:51 -0700
>> (not processed: message size (36922) exceeds max size (25600))
>>
>> X-MDRcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>
>> X-Rcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>
>> X-MDRemoteIP: 10.10.210.11
>>
>> X-Return-Path: smiller@costuless.com
>>
>> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>
> I would say go and complain to them and let them know whats going on.
>
gw, did you notice both the From: and To: are from Sean and Sean is
asking about the problem, so I think he has let him know what's going on!
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: wrong dates displayed on email but correct date stamped in header. |
 |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:55:03 -040 |
Daniel wrote:
> gwtc wrote:
>> Sean wrote:
>>> I have a few new products that I receive email from.
>>> One is a Cisco ACS appliance and the other is a eFax.
>>> Both send emails constantly but are dated 12/31/1969.
>>> I opened the headers and the correct date is in the header.
>>> Anyone know why these specific emails would display a different
>>> date and time stamp in my email in box other than whats in the
>>> header of the email. Here is an example of a good header.
>>>
>>> Return-path: <smiller@costuless.com>
>>>
>>> Received: from 10.10.210.11 by costuless.com (MDaemon PRO
v9.0.1)
>>> with ESMTP id md50000979531.msg for <smiller@costuless.com>;
Tue, 27
>>> Jun 2006 11:12:51 -0700
>>>
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>
>>> From: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>>
>>> To: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>>>
>>> X-HP-DIGITAL_SENDER: HP Digital Sender Service
>>>
>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>> boundary="=cMc_xLc_8iL08i205U.41c67ea6"
>>>
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>
>>> X-Spam-Processed: costuless.com, Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:51
-0700
>>> (not processed: message size (36922) exceeds max size (25600))
>>>
>>> X-MDRcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>>
>>> X-Rcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>>
>>> X-MDRemoteIP: 10.10.210.11
>>>
>>> X-Return-Path: smiller@costuless.com
>>>
>>> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>>
>> I would say go and complain to them and let them know whats going on.
>>
>
> gw, did you notice both the From: and To: are from Sean and Sean is
> asking about the problem, so I think he has let him know what's going on!
>
> Daniel
Uh Sean is giving us an example. Both problems sound like a wrong date
at either the other end or the mail server.
--
Lou
Do something good for the world!
These folks have a system that uses the time your machine would be
idling showing a screen saver to do something good.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: wrong dates displayed on email but correct date stamped in header. |
 |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:53:33 +100 |
Lou wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>> gwtc wrote:
>>> Sean wrote:
>>>> I have a few new products that I receive email from.
>>>> One is a Cisco ACS appliance and the other is a eFax.
>>>> Both send emails constantly but are dated 12/31/1969.
>>>> I opened the headers and the correct date is in the header.
>>>> Anyone know why these specific emails would display a
different
>>>> date and time stamp in my email in box other than whats in the
>>>> header of the email. Here is an example of a good header.
>>>>
>>>> Return-path: <smiller@costuless.com>
>>>>
>>>> Received: from 10.10.210.11 by costuless.com (MDaemon PRO
>>>> v9.0.1) with ESMTP id md50000979531.msg for
<smiller@costuless.com>;
>>>> Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:51 -0700
>>>>
>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>
>>>> From: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>>
>>>> To: SEAN MILLER <smiller@costuless.com>
>>>>
>>>> X-HP-DIGITAL_SENDER: HP Digital Sender Service
>>>>
>>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>>> boundary="=cMc_xLc_8iL08i205U.41c67ea6"
>>>>
>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>>
>>>> X-Spam-Processed: costuless.com, Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:51
-0700
>>>> (not processed: message size (36922) exceeds max size (25600))
>>>>
>>>> X-MDRcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>>>
>>>> X-Rcpt-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>>>
>>>> X-MDRemoteIP: 10.10.210.11
>>>>
>>>> X-Return-Path: smiller@costuless.com
>>>>
>>>> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: smiller@costuless.com
>>>>
>>> I would say go and complain to them and let them know whats going
on.
>>>
>>
>> gw, did you notice both the From: and To: are from Sean and Sean is
>> asking about the problem, so I think he has let him know what's going
on!
>>
>> Daniel
>
> Uh Sean is giving us an example. Both problems sound like a wrong date
> at either the other end or the mail server.
>
OK!!
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|