|
| Lightning 0.8 still does not solve my problem |
 |
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:21:07 -070 |
Just a little note to mention that I tried out Lightning 0.8 @ work.
They use a proxy and filter many things. I was not able to get it to get
to my remote calendars hosted by my domain through Apache/WebDav. We had
spoke of this before. There is some bug # associate with this. I looked
through my old postings here but could not find it.
In any event, Lightning 0.8 still does not solve this problem.
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
Why can't women put on mascara with their mouth closed?
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Lightning 0.8 still does not solve my problem |
 |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:16:53 -070 |
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Just a little note to mention that I tried out Lightning 0.8 @ work.
> They use a proxy and filter many things. I was not able to get it to get
> to my remote calendars hosted by my domain through Apache/WebDav. We had
> spoke of this before. There is some bug # associate with this. I looked
> through my old postings here but could not find it.
>
> In any event, Lightning 0.8 still does not solve this problem.
> --
> Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
> Why can't women put on mascara with their mouth closed?
Why didn't Thunderbird follow the doubledashes wuth a space? It's there
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Lightning 0.8 still does not solve my problem |
 |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:57:41 -070 |
Beryl wrote:
> Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> Just a little note to mention that I tried out Lightning 0.8 @ work.
>> They use a proxy and filter many things. I was not able to get it to
>> get to my remote calendars hosted by my domain through Apache/WebDav.
>> We had spoke of this before. There is some bug # associate with this.
>> I looked through my old postings here but could not find it.
>>
>> In any event, Lightning 0.8 still does not solve this problem.
>> --
>> Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
>> Why can't women put on mascara with their mouth closed?
>
> Why didn't Thunderbird follow the doubledashes wuth a space? It's
> there when I View/Message Source, but doesn't appear in the reader
> window.
It's a bug in that the signature is not properly delimited in the HTML
portion of the message.
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
For people who like peace and quiet: a phoneless cord.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Lightning 0.8 still does not solve my problem |
 |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:12:29 -040 |
Beryl wrote:
> Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> Just a little note to mention that I tried out Lightning 0.8 @ work.
>> They use a proxy and filter many things. I was not able to get it to
>> get to my remote calendars hosted by my domain through Apache/WebDav.
>> We had spoke of this before. There is some bug # associate with this.
>> I looked through my old postings here but could not find it.
>>
>> In any event, Lightning 0.8 still does not solve this problem.
>> --
>> Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
>> Why can't women put on mascara with their mouth closed?
>
> Why didn't Thunderbird follow the doubledashes wuth a space? It's there
> when I View/Message Source, but doesn't appear in the reader window.
Andrew's doubledash/space sig delimiter does not work because it's
composed in html. The delimiter only works for text/plain messages.
Melchert's message is in text/plain and the proper delimiter works there
(as it does in this one).
--
|
| Post Reply
|
| signature format revisited [was Re: Lightning 0.8 still does not |
 |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:34:15 +020 |
On 01-04-2008 09:16 CET, Beryl composed this enchanting statement:
> Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> <x>
>> In any event, Lightning 0.8 still does not solve this problem.
>> --
>> Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
>> Why can't women put on mascara with their mouth closed?
>
> Why didn't Thunderbird follow the doubledashes wuth a space? It's
> there when I View/Message Source, but doesn't appear in the reader
> window.
Is that the one above?
Here's mine.
(Note: follow-up -> mozilla.support.thunderbird)
--
Kind regards,
Melchert
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|