|
| Re: What's wrong with this Indian cent? |
 |
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:30:27 -050 |
"don't look" <don't look@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:r7Whj.415555$kj1.255429@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Problems with this?Not the prettiest but...Trying to ebay it.No bids at
> $9.99
Common date. I would say EF45 - AU50 with a few spots. CW Trends at $20+
Price seems okay for anyone needing one in that grade. I might have even
bid if I saw the auction, depending on your postage. IMO, you might reduce
the file size and color saturation a bit like below.........
Bruce
|
| Post Reply
|
 |
| View Original Image |
| What's wrong with this Indian cent? |
 |
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:04:56 GMT |
Problems with this?Not the prettiest but...Trying to ebay it.No bids at
$9.99
|
| Post Reply
|
 |
| View Original Image |
 |
| View Original Image |
| Re: What's wrong with this Indian cent? |
 |
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:28:25 GMT |
"Bruce Remick" <remick@cox.net> wrote in message
news:nvWhj.33650$pq.6785@newsfe24.lga...
>
> "don't look" <don't look@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message
> news:r7Whj.415555$kj1.255429@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > Problems with this?Not the prettiest but...Trying to ebay it.No bids
at
> > $9.99
>
>
> Common date. I would say EF45 - AU50 with a few spots. CW Trends at
$20+
> Price seems okay for anyone needing one in that grade. I might have even
> bid if I saw the auction, depending on your postage. IMO, you might
reduce
> the file size and color saturation a bit like below.........
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
Thanks Bruce.Guess I don't know alot about Indians.Thought it was BU. Didn't
pay BU price for it though. I need to brush up on grading indians before I
make a fool of myself. Your picture looks better.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: What's wrong with this Indian cent? |
 |
Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:41:22 -050 |
"don't look" <don't look@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:JlXhj.127261$MJ6.51280@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> "Bruce Remick" <remick@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:nvWhj.33650$pq.6785@newsfe24.lga...
>>
>> "don't look" <don't look@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message
>> news:r7Whj.415555$kj1.255429@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> > Problems with this?Not the prettiest but...Trying to ebay it.No
bids at
>> > $9.99
>>
>>
>> Common date. I would say EF45 - AU50 with a few spots. CW Trends
at
> $20+
>> Price seems okay for anyone needing one in that grade. I might have
even
>> bid if I saw the auction, depending on your postage. IMO, you might
> reduce
>> the file size and color saturation a bit like below.........
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>>
> Thanks Bruce.Guess I don't know alot about Indians.Thought it was BU.
> Didn't
> pay BU price for it though. I need to brush up on grading indians before I
> make a fool of myself. Your picture looks better.
Hey, my grade opinion has no more authority than anyone else's. There
probably will be some that would accept it as uncirculated, while maybe not
the choice BU RED as you describe it in your auction. I see your $9.99
minimum now has been met so it may see even more action in the last five
minutes.
Bruce
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: What's wrong with this Indian cent? |
 |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:00:13 -000 |
"Bruce Remick" <remick@cox.net> wrote in message
news:nvWhj.33650$pq.6785@newsfe24.lga...
>
> "don't look" <don't look@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:r7Whj.415555$kj1.255429@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> Problems with this?Not the prettiest but...Trying to ebay it.No bids
at
>> $9.99
>
>
> Common date. I would say EF45 - AU50 with a few spots. CW Trends at
> $20+ Price seems okay for anyone needing one in that grade. I might have
> even bid if I saw the auction, depending on your postage. IMO, you might
> reduce the file size and color saturation a bit like below.........
>
> Bruce
I'd go along with AU-50 or 55. There's a trace of wear to the right of the
ribbon. So I don't think it could be called BU. Grading accurately from a
photo is always difficult, e.g., is it due to a weak strike? I would not
say it is as low as EF-45, though.
--
Mike Dworetsky
(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|