Groups > eComStation > OpenOffice on eComStation > Re: OOo204RC2 - export to PDF looks ugly




OOo204RC2 - export to PDF looks ugly

OOo204RC2 - export to PDF looks ugly
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:38:28 +020
Bold fonts ie are a problem.

115 makes a much nicer job - what's wrong..??

hilsen / regards
-- 
steen bondo

http://kajakparadis.dk <X> http://menzi.dk <X> http://oz6bu.dk
http://filshuse-teltplads.dk <X> ftp://ftp.menzi.dk
Post Reply
Re: OOo204RC2 - export to PDF looks ugly
Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:57:27 -050
steen bondo wrote:
> Bold fonts ie are a problem.
> 
> 115 makes a much nicer job - what's wrong..??

I'm told this is a known problem which will be fixed before the GA.

Regards,
Bob St.John
Post Reply
Re: OOo204RC2 - export to PDF looks ugly
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:03:12 -070
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:57:27 -0500, Bob St.John wrote:

>I'm told this is a known problem which will be fixed before the GA.

Speaking of which - any time estimate for a next RC or the GA? 

Anything more planned for WPS integration? At least writing a file type when
saving a document would be handy (my girlfriend always uses 'save as' instead
of copying files using the WPS, so my manually assigned file types get lost
and I have to use file extension to keep the association).

Will the GA be based on the latest OOo (2.2) or the 2.0.x line?

Cheers
Andreas



-- 

Andreas Ludwig
Vancouver, BC
using PMINews 2 on eCS 1.2R German!



Post Reply
Re: OOo204RC2 - export to PDF looks ugly
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:46:13 -070
Andreas Ludwig wrote:

> Will the GA be based on the latest OOo (2.2) or the 2.0.x line?

It will be based on the 2.0.x line, so that people who paid for it will 
get a GA release.  To get future 2.2.x releases, assuming they come, 
Post Reply
Re: OOo204RC2 - export to PDF looks ugly
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:19:54 -070
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:46:13 -0700, Steve Wendt wrote:

>> Will the GA be based on the latest OOo (2.2) or the 2.0.x line?
>
>It will be based on the 2.0.x line, so that people who paid for it will 
>get a GA release.  To get future 2.2.x releases, assuming they come, 
>requires a current subscription (i.e. a renewal).

Makes a lot of sense. I would rather have a stable and well WPS integrated
version 2.0.x than a straight 2.2.x port without any eSC specific features.

Cheers
Andreas

-- 

Andreas Ludwig
Vancouver, BC
using PMINews 2 on eCS 1.2R German!



Post Reply
about | contact