Groups > Browsers > Opera Browser Beta versions > Re: Why is print dialog fixed in 9.27, but not in 9.50 betas?




Why is print dialog fixed in 9.27, but not in 9.50 betas?

Why is print dialog fixed in 9.27, but not in 9.50 betas?
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:34:35 +020
I still do not get the print dialog in build 4758, Mac OS X Leopard.
Known Issue?
If so, why is this solved in 9.27, but not in 9.50b?

Post Reply
Re: Why is print dialog fixed in 9.27, but not in 9.50 betas?
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:40:13 +020
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:34:35 +0200, hansa <hansa_at_zonnet_nl@nospam.com> 

wrote:

> I still do not get the print dialog in build 4758, Mac OS X Leopard.
> Known Issue?
> If so, why is this solved in 9.27, but not in 9.50b?

After all they use a different code base in many areas so fixing it in one  
of them does not necessarily mean it's fixed for the other version aswell.  
However this is on the known issues list for Kestrel (see  
<http://my.opera.com/macteam/blog/2008/02/22/new-kestrelsnapshot-4669>), 

so this will also be fixed in 9.50 at some point.
-- 
Regards
Post Reply
Re: Why is print dialog fixed in 9.27, but not in 9.50 betas?
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:14:57 +020
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:40:13 +0200, Ralf Demuth <news@demuths.de> wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:34:35 +0200, hansa  
> <hansa_at_zonnet_nl@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> I still do not get the print dialog in build 4758, Mac OS X Leopard.
>> Known Issue?
>> If so, why is this solved in 9.27, but not in 9.50b?
>
> After all they use a different code base in many areas so fixing it in  
> one of them does not necessarily mean it's fixed for the other version  
> aswell. However this is on the known issues list for Kestrel (see  
>
<http://my.opera.com/macteam/blog/2008/02/22/new-kestrelsnapshot-4669>), 

> so this will also be fixed in 9.50 at some point.

OK, thanks. I expected different code bases, but also thought that if the  
solution is available for one version, just share it with the developers  
of the other version.
Basically, I expected it to be implemented quickly in 9.50 since the  
problem is solved for 9.27.

Post Reply
about | contact