|
| Re: ping Moody |
 |
Wed, 07 May 2008 04:17:58 -070 |
John M wrote::
> Goomeri wrote:
>> well mate how are you doing?
>>
>> anyway I'm giving a trial to Comodo 3 and just running the firewall
>> option.
>>
>> now you asked me, and my laptop runs a pentium M (1.6 ghz) ok
>>
>> do I need to install Defense if I already have a anti-virus and
>> spyware running?
>
> It adds aspects of security which they don't cover. I doubt that it adds
> very much in the way of running processes, probably using the same hooks
> that the firewall component has to use.
>
>>
>> and if you have the time what's this 'leak protection' all about
please?
>
> It's probably just referring to outgoing connection monitoring.
>
>>
>> if you know, how much of a resource hog is this version of Comodo?
>> my lad runs a Lenovo laptop with a 'lesser' chip (starts with C) so I
>> wonder if or how much of Comodo 3 won't be a drag on his machine.
>
> Best advice is just to try it. Any slowdown is likely to be minimal, I
> think, and it's always going to be subjective anyway. Unless there are
> major demands being made on the processor, I doubt that the difference
> in speed will be significant.
>
I couldn't have said any of the above better than John just did.
Running it's the only way you will know for sure.
Just a note though, Kevin does try to make things light on resources
and from what I have heard, he and he alone wrote the new version.
--
Gary
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: ping Moody |
 |
Wed, 07 May 2008 04:32:48 -070 |
Goomeri wrote::
> John M wrote:
>> Goomeri wrote:
>
> Thanks John M (so are you Moody as well?)
I was hoping no one would figure that out. <BG>
> Anyway mate I have done a bit of a 'song and dance' about this evening,
> taking a look here, a geeza there, and read, a think etc etc
>
> So will give Online Armor a shot.
That program *will* slow things down, if you use the HIP part, as will
BOClean, if you have all the bells and whistles enabled.
> Pity we don't have Sygate anymore. You think it might still be OK?
> Probably not I suppose.
You mean it's not available to you over there?
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Download+Sygate&btnG=Google+Search
--
Gary
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: ping Moody |
 |
Wed, 07 May 2008 04:40:02 -070 |
Goomeri wrote::
> John M wrote:
>> Goomeri wrote:
>
> Pity we don't have Sygate anymore. You think it might still be OK?
> Probably not I suppose.
http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=sygate
--
Gary
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: ping Moody |
 |
Wed, 07 May 2008 08:58:01 -060 |
Goomeri wrote:
> well mate how are you doing?
>
> anyway I'm giving a trial to Comodo 3 and just running the firewall
option.
>
> now you asked me, and my laptop runs a pentium M (1.6 ghz) ok
>
> do I need to install Defense if I already have a anti-virus and spyware
> running?
My son has installed Comodo and recommends switching from Clean PC Mode
to Safe Mode ASAP otherwise it gives a pass to existing trojans /malware
/viruses. ZoneAlarm alerts would crash his online-full screen games but
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: ping Moody |
 |
Wed, 07 May 2008 11:24:31 +010 |
Goomeri wrote:
> well mate how are you doing?
>
> anyway I'm giving a trial to Comodo 3 and just running the firewall
option.
>
> now you asked me, and my laptop runs a pentium M (1.6 ghz) ok
>
> do I need to install Defense if I already have a anti-virus and spyware
> running?
It adds aspects of security which they don't cover. I doubt that it adds
very much in the way of running processes, probably using the same hooks
that the firewall component has to use.
>
> and if you have the time what's this 'leak protection' all about please?
It's probably just referring to outgoing connection monitoring.
>
> if you know, how much of a resource hog is this version of Comodo?
> my lad runs a Lenovo laptop with a 'lesser' chip (starts with C) so I
> wonder if or how much of Comodo 3 won't be a drag on his machine.
Best advice is just to try it. Any slowdown is likely to be minimal, I
think, and it's always going to be subjective anyway. Unless there are
major demands being made on the processor, I doubt that the difference
in speed will be significant.
>
> be good to hear from you.
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|