|
| E.D. |
 |
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 22:00:10 -0400 |
"ELECTILE DISFUNCTION":
The inability to become aroused over any of the choices for President put
forth by either party so far in the 2008 election year.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: E.D. |
 |
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 23:01:35 -0700 |
"Sylvesterthekat" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9A73E3E4ACE02sylvesterthekat@216.154.195.61...
> They really really HAVE to change this process if for no other reason than
> for an incumbent President after one term or as is usual the VP after two,
> they have to find a lot less money to go campaigning than their potential
> counterparts on the other side. It's not fair. And the whole nominee
> process is flawed and divisive; it should be decided within the party by
> sitting senators and congress rather than by the public. That would cut
> out
> the necessity to raise enormous sums of money and would make the process
> less volatile and more 'seemly'.
Just like parliment eh? ;-) System is specifically designed to NOT do that
for the most part..
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: E.D. |
 |
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 05:24:06 +0000 |
"Heidi" <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote in
news:fsupdn$6dk$1@news.spamcop.net:
> "ELECTILE DISFUNCTION":
>
>
> The inability to become aroused over any of the choices for President
> put forth by either party so far in the 2008 election year.
LOL, good one.
They really really HAVE to change this process if for no other reason than
for an incumbent President after one term or as is usual the VP after two,
they have to find a lot less money to go campaigning than their potential
counterparts on the other side. It's not fair. And the whole nominee
process is flawed and divisive; it should be decided within the party by
sitting senators and congress rather than by the public. That would cut out
the necessity to raise enormous sums of money and would make the process
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: E.D. |
 |
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:49:31 +0000 |
"Chris F. Willoughby" <avoozl@spamcop.net> wrote in
news:fsv7e8$bn9$1@news.spamcop.net:
> Just like parliment eh? ;-) System is specifically designed to NOT do
> that for the most part..
>
>
>
well kind of yes. i daresay when the system was designed it wasn't such a
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: E.D. |
 |
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:58:05 +0000 |
It wasn't me! It was Sylvesterthekat <me@privacy.net>!
> well kind of yes. i daresay when the system was designed it wasn't
> such a circus as it is now. it's out of control
I daresay someone has been up for a really long time, now, and should maybe
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|