Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:08:19 -0600
Received: from xmrt0101.northgrum.com (xmrt0101.northgrum.com
[208.20.220.55]) by mx1.mx.voyager.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C238E2159
for <x>; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:07:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from XBHT0001.northgrum.com ([132.228.189.53]) by
xmrt0101.northgrum.com with InterScan Message Security Suite; Wed, 21 Nov
2007 12:08:42 -0800
Received: from XBHTX102.northgrum.com ([134.223.192.23]) by
XBHT0001.northgrum.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:10:06 -0500
Received: from XMBTX132.northgrum.com ([134.223.195.13]) by
XBHTX102.northgrum.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:10:06 -0600
From: x
To: <big listof addresses edited out>
Subject: RE: PLEEEEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA TODAY
SHOW
X-Originalarrivaltime: 21 Nov 2007 20:10:06.0783 (UTC)
FILETIME=[828ADCF0:01C82C7A]
X-Dspam-Signature: 37745,4744ac15357964272315007
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
References: <NOEOKBBOAELDOBDNBFFCEEELCEAA.metsyssol@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MS-Tnef-Correlator:
X-Dspam-Probability: 1
X-Dspam-Result: Spam
Thread-Index: Acgr4kS7xhf7614jQFiorvTXi62a2wAl/38/
Thread-Topic: PLEEEEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA TODAY
SHOW
X-MS-Has-Attach:
Message-Id:
<CB44A8ED23F88E408503677D1F0985CD0CDBFC@XMBTX132.northgrum.com>
Multipart_boundary:
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Dspam-Confidence: 0.5065
PLEASE STOP RESPONDING with "REPLY ALL" ...
-Berta
________________________________
From: x [mailto:x]
Sent: Tue 11/20/2007 5:59 PM
To: <big list edited out>
Subject: RE: PLEEEEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA TODAY
SHOW
Eduardo,
I also believed in you when you ordered appraisals from but failed to pay
for them. So I'll add you to my list of things mythical characters.
See ya,
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: x [mailto:x]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 4:11 PM
To: <big list edited out>
Subject: Re: PLEEEEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA TODAY
SHOW
Michael also believe in toothfairies, elves, trolls, gnomes and most of all
Santa Claus.
----- Original Message ----
From: x <x>
To: <big list edited out>.
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:32:21 PM
Subject: Re: PLEEEEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA TODAY
SHOW
Hi Michael,
These are never real. You can read about this one at:
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/nothing/microsoft-aol.asp
<http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/nothing/microsoft-aol.asp>
This site contains information on popular mass emails and web stories and
indicates whether they are true or 'urban legends' and the research that
proves it.
See you soon,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: x [mailto:x]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 06:42 AM
To: <big list edited out>
Subject: FW: PLEEEEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA TODAY
SHOW
?
-----Original Message-----
From: x [mailto:x]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 7:54 PM
Subject: PLEEEEEEEEASE REEEEEAD! IT WAS ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA TODAY SHOW
Read This!!!
Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:15:44 -0700
Read carefully... THIS TOOK TWO PAGES OF THE TUESDAY USA TODAY - IT IS FOR
REAL To all of my friends, I do not usually forward messages, But this is
from my friend Pearlas Sandborn and she really is an attorney. If she says
that this will work - It will work. After all, what have you got to lose?
SORRY EVERYBODY.. JUST HAD TO TAKE THE CHANCE!!! I'm an attorney, And I know
the law. This thing is for real. Rest assured AOL and Intel will follow
through with their promises for fear of facing a multimillion-dollar class
action suit similar to the one filed by PepsiCo against General Electric not
too long ago. Dear Friends: Please do not take this for a junk letter. Bill
Gates sharing his fortune. If you ignore this, You will repent later.
Microsoft and AOL are now the largest Internet companies and in an effort to
make sure that Internet Explorer remains the most widely used program,
Microsoft and AOL are running an e-mail beta test. When you forward this
e-mail to friends, Microsoft can and will track it (If you are a Microsoft
Windows user) for a two week time period. For every person that you forward
this e-mail to, Microsoft will pay you $245.00 For every person that you
sent it to that forwards it on, Microsoft will pay you $243.00 and for every
third person that receives it, You will be paid $241.00. Within two weeks,
Microsoft will contact you for your address and then send you a check.
Regards. Charles S Bailey General Manager Field Operations 1-800-842-2332
Ext. 1085 or 904-1085 or R NX 292-1085 Thought this was a scam myself, But
two weeks after receiving this e-mail and forwarding it on. Microsoft
contacted me for my address and within days, I received a check for $24,
800.00. You need to respond before the beta testing is over. If anyone can
afford this, Bill gates is the man. It's all marketing expense to him.
Please forward this to as many people as possible. You are bound to get at
least $10, 000.00 We're not going to help them out with their e-mail beta
test without getting a little something for our time. My brother's
girlfriend got in on this a few months ago. When I went to visit him for the
Baylor/UT game, she showed me her check. It was for the sum of $4,324.44 and
was stamped "Paid In Full".
>x~x><-><x~x<
=============
|
Read in .spam, posted to spamcop & .spam, f/ups spamcop
RandallW wrote:
<snip forwarded email>
This is not spam. This is another form of unwanted mail. You could be
doing your communicating with some persona you 'know' from an email
perspective rather than communicating with the spamcop.spam group.
For here, we can discuss my opinion about that or your feelings about my
opinion about that or the 'meaning' of various forms of social spam and
how to manage social spam.
Social spam shouldn't be SC reported. Of course you can discuss any
kind of spam you feel like discussing here. IMO.
This item starts with a classic 1997 snopes listed urban legend and then
gets forwarded and forwarded. IMO the very first recipient who forwards
is just as guilty as the originator and thus the blame propagates to
each subsequent forwarder.
We have also been discussing the 'phenomenon' of crossposted messages in
newsgroups in the usenet group news.software.readers and I am in a
minority in my opinion about how it should be handled when I read a
message crossposted to alt.spam and a number of other groups.
I 'always' snip out all of the other crossposted groups and my reply and
thus its followups only go into the group where I read it, no others.
This of course is problematic for the participants in the conversation
who do not even read alt.spam, but participate in the thread from other
groups.
This email forwarding business is the same way. Each forwarder,
including the ones who were debunking the urban myth, was addressing hir
remarks to all of the To:/s just like crossposted newsmessages. Should
they have been doing that? Should they have been 'lecturing' all of the
other To/s about how each forwarder before shouldn't have been?
Something else?
--
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin
|
Read in .spam, posted to spamcop & .spam, f/ups spamcop
RandallW wrote:
<snip forwarded email>
This is not spam. This is another form of unwanted mail. You could be
doing your communicating with some persona you 'know' from an email
perspective rather than communicating with the spamcop.spam group.
For here, we can discuss my opinion about that or your feelings about my
opinion about that or the 'meaning' of various forms of social spam and
how to manage social spam.
Social spam shouldn't be SC reported. Of course you can discuss any
kind of spam you feel like discussing here. IMO.
This item starts with a classic 1997 snopes listed urban legend and then
gets forwarded and forwarded. IMO the very first recipient who forwards
is just as guilty as the originator and thus the blame propagates to
each subsequent forwarder.
We have also been discussing the 'phenomenon' of crossposted messages in
newsgroups in the usenet group news.software.readers and I am in a
minority in my opinion about how it should be handled when I read a
message crossposted to alt.spam and a number of other groups.
I 'always' snip out all of the other crossposted groups and my reply and
thus its followups only go into the group where I read it, no others.
This of course is problematic for the participants in the conversation
who do not even read alt.spam, but participate in the thread from other
groups.
This email forwarding business is the same way. Each forwarder,
including the ones who were debunking the urban myth, was addressing hir
remarks to all of the To:/s just like crossposted newsmessages. Should
they have been doing that? Should they have been 'lecturing' all of the
other To/s about how each forwarder before shouldn't have been?
Something else?
--
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin
|
