Signing with DevCert gives 'Unable to install' error

Hi all,

I'm new to v9 and the signing process.
I wanted to use protected UID with developer certificate but on my Nokia 
3250 I'm getting 'Unable to install' message at the very end of the 
installation process. If I try using that same developer certificate 
with unprotected UID it works just fine.

Is that the expected behavior? If so at which point do you have to 
switch to protected UID? Just before submitting your application to the 
signing process? I thought developer certificate would let you use 
protected UID since they are valid only for a very limited set of 
devices specified by IMEIs.

Cheers,
Stéphane Lenclud.

It should work. Can you provide mmp files and pkg files for case that works,
and case that does not work.
Regards
H

"Stéphane Lenclud" <stephane@lenclud.com> wrote in message
news:8cfuf84yGHA.5056@UKCOL01WWEB01.symbian.intra...
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to v9 and the signing process.
> I wanted to use protected UID with developer certificate but on my Nokia
> 3250 I'm getting 'Unable to install' message at the very end of the
> installation process. If I try using that same developer certificate
> with unprotected UID it works just fine.
>
> Is that the expected behavior? If so at which point do you have to
> switch to protected UID? Just before submitting your application to the
> signing process? I thought developer certificate would let you use
> protected UID since they are valid only for a very limited set of
> devices specified by IMEIs.
>
> Cheers,
> Stéphane Lenclud.
>
>

Hi Hamish,
Thanks for your answer.

-For the case that works just use the Helloworldbasic example from the 
S60-3rd-MR SDK and sign the SIS file with self-signed cert.

-For the case that does not work use the same example en replace the 
UIDs with a protected UID -there is two UIDs in MMP, one in PKG, on in 
reg resource, one in code- then sign it with a DevCert. I was using a 
DevCert for one IMEI with all possible capabilities and Helloworldbasic 
needs none.

Cheers,
S.






Hamish Willee wrote:
> It should work. Can you provide mmp files and pkg files for case that
works,
> and case that does not work.
> Regards
> H
> 
> "Stéphane Lenclud" <stephane@lenclud.com> wrote in message
> news:8cfuf84yGHA.5056@UKCOL01WWEB01.symbian.intra...
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm new to v9 and the signing process.
>> I wanted to use protected UID with developer certificate but on my
Nokia
>> 3250 I'm getting 'Unable to install' message at the very end of the
>> installation process. If I try using that same developer certificate
>> with unprotected UID it works just fine.
>>
>> Is that the expected behavior? If so at which point do you have to
>> switch to protected UID? Just before submitting your application to
the
>> signing process? I thought developer certificate would let you use
>> protected UID since they are valid only for a very limited set of
>> devices specified by IMEIs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Stéphane Lenclud.
>>
>>
> 

Hi,
I eventually managed to get a DevCert working with protected UID on a 
Nokia N91. Don't know what's wrong with my 3250, I'll try again soon ;)
Cheers,
S.


Stéphane Lenclud wrote:
> Hi Hamish,
> Thanks for your answer.
> 
> -For the case that works just use the Helloworldbasic example from the 
> S60-3rd-MR SDK and sign the SIS file with self-signed cert.
> 
> -For the case that does not work use the same example en replace the 
> UIDs with a protected UID -there is two UIDs in MMP, one in PKG, on in 
> reg resource, one in code- then sign it with a DevCert. I was using a 
> DevCert for one IMEI with all possible capabilities and Helloworldbasic 
> needs none.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hamish Willee wrote:
>> It should work. Can you provide mmp files and pkg files for case that 
>> works,
>> and case that does not work.
>> Regards
>> H
>>
>> "Stéphane Lenclud" <stephane@lenclud.com> wrote in
message
>> news:8cfuf84yGHA.5056@UKCOL01WWEB01.symbian.intra...
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm new to v9 and the signing process.
>>> I wanted to use protected UID with developer certificate but on my
Nokia
>>> 3250 I'm getting 'Unable to install' message at the very end of
the
>>> installation process. If I try using that same developer
certificate
>>> with unprotected UID it works just fine.
>>>
>>> Is that the expected behavior? If so at which point do you have to
>>> switch to protected UID? Just before submitting your application to
the
>>> signing process? I thought developer certificate would let you use
>>> protected UID since they are valid only for a very limited set of
>>> devices specified by IMEIs.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stéphane Lenclud.
>>>
>>>
>>