sign installer

Hi all.

I would like to sign a sis file which install a swf file on a terminal. 
That sis only places the swf file in a folder to be played by the 
flashplayer. I have created the sis signed with a developer certificate, 
and it is installed correctly. My question is if my application should 
pass tests to be signed, because it is only a flash application, and in 

My guru in the Symbian Signed team says that you'll need to have the file
Symbian Signed if you use any capabilities that require signing. (If not,
you'll need to sign it yourself to install it on a S60 phone.)

During the signing process, you will need to pass some of the tests, but if
there are tests that are not applicable, submit the file for signing with a
waiver explaining why the tests are inappropriate.

Mark Shackman
Symbian Developer Network


"Felix Garcia" <fgarcia@mystrands.com> wrote in message
news:C06zhigPHHA.6124@UKCOL01WWEB01.symbian.intra...
> Hi all.
>
> I would like to sign a sis file which install a swf file on a terminal.
> That sis only places the swf file in a folder to be played by the
> flashplayer. I have created the sis signed with a developer certificate,
> and it is installed correctly. My question is if my application should
> pass tests to be signed, because it is only a flash application, and in
> that case I believe that the signed application is the flash player...

Mark Shackman wrote:
> My guru in the Symbian Signed team says that you'll need to have the file
> Symbian Signed if you use any capabilities that require signing. (If not,
> you'll need to sign it yourself to install it on a S60 phone.)
> 
> During the signing process, you will need to pass some of the tests, but
if
> there are tests that are not applicable, submit the file for signing with
a
> waiver explaining why the tests are inappropriate.
> 
> Mark Shackman
> Symbian Developer Network
> 
> 
> "Felix Garcia" <fgarcia@mystrands.com> wrote in message
> news:C06zhigPHHA.6124@UKCOL01WWEB01.symbian.intra...
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I would like to sign a sis file which install a swf file on a
terminal.
>> That sis only places the swf file in a folder to be played by the
>> flashplayer. I have created the sis signed with a developer
certificate,
>> and it is installed correctly. My question is if my application should
>> pass tests to be signed, because it is only a flash application, and
in
>> that case I believe that the signed application is the flash player...
> 
> 


I don't need any capabilities. I only want to put a swf file in a folder 
to be played with flashplayer! My doubt is how to sign the application 
to be able to be installed in any mobile phone, because now I am signing 
it using a developer certificate for all mobile phones of my company, 
but it can't be installed in any mobile phone!

Felix Garcia a écrit :
> Mark Shackman wrote:
>> My guru in the Symbian Signed team says that you'll need to have the
file
>> Symbian Signed if you use any capabilities that require signing. (If
not,
>> you'll need to sign it yourself to install it on a S60 phone.)
>>
>> During the signing process, you will need to pass some of the tests, 
>> but if
>> there are tests that are not applicable, submit the file for signing 
>> with a
>> waiver explaining why the tests are inappropriate.
>>
>> Mark Shackman
>> Symbian Developer Network
>>
>>
>> "Felix Garcia" <fgarcia@mystrands.com> wrote in
message
>> news:C06zhigPHHA.6124@UKCOL01WWEB01.symbian.intra...
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I would like to sign a sis file which install a swf file on a
terminal.
>>> That sis only places the swf file in a folder to be played by the
>>> flashplayer. I have created the sis signed with a developer
certificate,
>>> and it is installed correctly. My question is if my application
should
>>> pass tests to be signed, because it is only a flash application,
and in
>>> that case I believe that the signed application is the flash
player...
>>
>>
> 
> 
> I don't need any capabilities. I only want to put a swf file in a folder 
> to be played with flashplayer! My doubt is how to sign the application 
> to be able to be installed in any mobile phone, because now I am signing 
> it using a developer certificate for all mobile phones of my company, 
> but it can't be installed in any mobile phone!
> 
> Thank you in advance.

Couldn't you just use a unprotected UID and sign the application with a 
self signed certificate ?

Stephane Bellanger wrote:
> Felix Garcia a écrit :
>> Mark Shackman wrote:
>>> My guru in the Symbian Signed team says that you'll need to have
the 
>>> file
>>> Symbian Signed if you use any capabilities that require signing.
(If 
>>> not,
>>> you'll need to sign it yourself to install it on a S60 phone.)
>>>
>>> During the signing process, you will need to pass some of the
tests, 
>>> but if
>>> there are tests that are not applicable, submit the file for
signing 
>>> with a
>>> waiver explaining why the tests are inappropriate.
>>>
>>> Mark Shackman
>>> Symbian Developer Network
>>>
>>>
>>> "Felix Garcia" <fgarcia@mystrands.com> wrote in
message
>>> news:C06zhigPHHA.6124@UKCOL01WWEB01.symbian.intra...
>>>> Hi all.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to sign a sis file which install a swf file on a
terminal.
>>>> That sis only places the swf file in a folder to be played by
the
>>>> flashplayer. I have created the sis signed with a developer 
>>>> certificate,
>>>> and it is installed correctly. My question is if my application
should
>>>> pass tests to be signed, because it is only a flash
application, and in
>>>> that case I believe that the signed application is the flash
player...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't need any capabilities. I only want to put a swf file in a 
>> folder to be played with flashplayer! My doubt is how to sign the 
>> application to be able to be installed in any mobile phone, because 
>> now I am signing it using a developer certificate for all mobile 
>> phones of my company, but it can't be installed in any mobile phone!
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Couldn't you just use a unprotected UID and sign the application with a 
> self signed certificate ?
> 
> Stephane.


I think so. But using a self signed certificate could I install it in