Re: Win4Lin 9.x for newer linuxes will not be happening

Victor:

Thanks for the post.  I was going to check the site again as well, but 
haven't had an opportunity yet.  There went $50 down the drain.  Oh 
well.  What's another $50 after the $600 I already spent before they 
pulled the plug on Win4Lin 5/9?

I'm afraid that this doesn't help my cynical view of the Win4Lin company 
very much.

I emailed Jim Provan a few minutes ago so see what happened to his site. 
  If I get an answer, I'll report back.

Frank.

Victor:

Thanks for the info.  I emailed Jim Provan a few minutes ago to see what 
  happened.  If I get an answer back, I'll post here.

I tried to send a message like this a few minutes ago, but it does not 
appear to have made it to the board, so I am posting again.

Frank.

I wanted to check on progress of this at www.win4lin9x-support.com and 
found that the browser had automatically been redirected to www.win4lin.com.

There is a post on the support forum dated yesterday under "win4lin
9x" 
indicating that the person behind trying to get win4lin9x working on 
newer kernels had given up...

Victor Warner.

Victor:

 >I too, like you, paid $50, but have not heard anything directly.<

I put in my first message that I had paid the $50, but not in the 
second, so I assume that my first message made it to the board.  Oddly 
enough, however, I still can't see it from here.

Anyway, no answer yet, but it wasn't bounced either, so I'll let you know.

Frank.

Frank

It will be interesting to hear what he has to write.

In his posting on the forum he indicated that he would connecting 
subscribers. I too, like you, paid $50, but have not heard anything 
directly.

Victor

Frank B wrote:
> 
> Victor:
> 
> Thanks for the info.  I emailed Jim Provan a few minutes ago to see what 
>  happened.  If I get an answer back, I'll post here.
> 
> I tried to send a message like this a few minutes ago, but it does not 
> appear to have made it to the board, so I am posting again.
> 
> Frank.
>