|
| XP Application Installed and Ran OK on Vista? |
 |
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:24:32 -080 |
I'm running Vista with Plus 2.6.1.3.
I have been creating separate installations using INNO for XP and Vista...XP
without the manifest files.
A customer bought a new computer with Vista.
I thought he had XP on it so I had him install the XP version.
Surprisingly, it installed and ran just fine.
This makes me curious.
Under what circumstances will an application run on Vista without manifest
files?
Since I compiled the app using a computer with Vista, does the Plus Runtime
inherit the manifest files when the app is installed?
Ted
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: XP Application Installed and Ran OK on Vista? |
 |
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:43:21 -060 |
In article <AwqF3$VeIHA.1872@news-server>, tedfanderson@gmail.com
says...
> I'm running Vista with Plus 2.6.1.3.
> I have been creating separate installations using INNO for XP and
Vista...XP
> without the manifest files.
> A customer bought a new computer with Vista.
> I thought he had XP on it so I had him install the XP version.
> Surprisingly, it installed and ran just fine.
Conversely, I've had no problems with deploying the new manifest files
to XP machines. Way less work than having separate installs. It may
come back to bite me but so far so good.
> Since I compiled the app using a computer with Vista, does the Plus Runtime
> inherit the manifest files when the app is installed?
No, nothing is automatic. If you don't include the manifest files in
your deploy routine they are not created.
--
Paul Van House
remove "_removeme_" for e-mail replies
Radio/TV Software and Baseball Stat Software:
http://www.binxsoftware.com
Radio photos, bloopers, and audio cuts:
http://www.binxsoftware.com/radio/radiodaze.htm
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: XP Application Installed and Ran OK on Vista? |
 |
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:07:22 -050 |
In article <AwqF3$VeIHA.1872@news-server>, tedfanderson@gmail.com
says...
> I'm running Vista with Plus 2.6.1.3.
> I have been creating separate installations using INNO for XP and
Vista...XP
> without the manifest files.
> A customer bought a new computer with Vista.
> I thought he had XP on it so I had him install the XP version.
> Surprisingly, it installed and ran just fine.
>
> This makes me curious.
> Under what circumstances will an application run on Vista without manifest
> files?
> Since I compiled the app using a computer with Vista, does the Plus Runtime
> inherit the manifest files when the app is installed?
>
> Ted
Ted,
I /think/ (I don't have Vista) that if you install without a manifest
file and it works, it likely means the user has turned off some security
like the User Account Control (UAC). You can't rely on all users to do
that. As well, without the manifest files I am not sure whether your
program will pickup Windows Themes.
--
Geoff Wass [dBVIPS]
Montréal, Québec, Canada
.|.|.| dBASE info at http://geocities.com/geoff_wass |.|.|.
.|.|.| ---------------------------------------------------------- |.|.|.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: XP Application Installed and Ran OK on Vista? |
 |
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:15:57 -080 |
Hi Paul,
The Vista compatibility notes on the dBase site make the following
statement:
"Vista Manifest files are not compatible with XP operating systems."
I took that to mean the XP system would not allow manifest files.
If XP just ignores them then that would make life a lot easier.
Thanks for the info.
Ted
"Paul Van House" <pvh_removeMe_@binxsoftware.com> wrote in
message
news:MPG.222fa388318fe39698974f@news.dbase.com...
> In article <AwqF3$VeIHA.1872@news-server>, tedfanderson@gmail.com
> says...
>> I'm running Vista with Plus 2.6.1.3.
>> I have been creating separate installations using INNO for XP and
>> Vista...XP
>> without the manifest files.
>> A customer bought a new computer with Vista.
>> I thought he had XP on it so I had him install the XP version.
>> Surprisingly, it installed and ran just fine.
> Conversely, I've had no problems with deploying the new manifest files
> to XP machines. Way less work than having separate installs. It may
> come back to bite me but so far so good.
>
>> Since I compiled the app using a computer with Vista, does the Plus
>> Runtime
>> inherit the manifest files when the app is installed?
> No, nothing is automatic. If you don't include the manifest files in
> your deploy routine they are not created.
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Van House
> remove "_removeme_" for e-mail replies
> Radio/TV Software and Baseball Stat Software:
> http://www.binxsoftware.com
> Radio photos, bloopers, and audio cuts:
> http://www.binxsoftware.com/radio/radiodaze.htm
> Family Home Page: http://vanhouse.binxsoftware.com
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: XP Application Installed and Ran OK on Vista? |
 |
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:46:07 -080 |
Hi Geoff,
Paul Van House says he has been including the manifest files in the XP
installations without any problems. I guess XP just ignores those files.
This will make deployment much easier.
One of the postings seems to state that there needs to be a
PlusRuntime.exe.manifest and also a <application>.exe.manifest in the same
folder as the <application>.exe.
On another posting someone said that the PlusRuntime is a wrapper that holds
the <application> so that there is no need to include the
<application>.exe.manifest file.
Do you know which is correct?
Thanks for the help,
Ted
"Geoff Wass [dBVIPS]" <gswassREMOVE_ME@attglobal.net> wrote in
message
news:MPG.222ffd88df607d44989f60@news.dbase.com...
> In article <AwqF3$VeIHA.1872@news-server>, tedfanderson@gmail.com
> says...
>> I'm running Vista with Plus 2.6.1.3.
>> I have been creating separate installations using INNO for XP and
>> Vista...XP
>> without the manifest files.
>> A customer bought a new computer with Vista.
>> I thought he had XP on it so I had him install the XP version.
>> Surprisingly, it installed and ran just fine.
>>
>> This makes me curious.
>> Under what circumstances will an application run on Vista without
>> manifest
>> files?
>> Since I compiled the app using a computer with Vista, does the Plus
>> Runtime
>> inherit the manifest files when the app is installed?
>>
>> Ted
>
>
> Ted,
>
> I /think/ (I don't have Vista) that if you install without a manifest
> file and it works, it likely means the user has turned off some security
> like the User Account Control (UAC). You can't rely on all users to do
> that. As well, without the manifest files I am not sure whether your
> program will pickup Windows Themes.
>
> --
> Geoff Wass [dBVIPS]
> Montréal, Québec, Canada
>
> .|.|.| dBASE info at http://geocities.com/geoff_wass |.|.|.
> .|.|.| ---------------------------------------------------------- |.|.|.
> .|.|.| IT Consultant http://Geoff_Wass.com |.|.|.
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|