|
| Evaulation of the RCs |
 |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:51:07 GMT |
At the moment I have three versions of eCS2.0 on my machine: beta3, RC1,
and RC4. Of these, only the beta3 is satisfactory.
I have been using RC1 as my main desktop for several months, and it is
flaky. It frequently hard crashes - no response to either the mouse or the
keyboard, and I have to hit the reset button. Most often this seems to
happen when I click on the 'x' to close a program. Also, behavior with eCS
games (solitaire, mahjong) is weird. The response to mouse clicks is slow.
Then after a few minutes the "windows list" screen comes up, and
double
clicking on 'solitaire' restores the speed of response to mouse movements.
(Not a big problem, but indicative of something wrong somewhere in the
code.) This is not the case with third party games, e.g. backgammon. But
it is the crashing (almost as bad as Windows 3.1;-( ) that is the real
PITA.
Now, as to RC4: My installation won't connect to the internet, and the USB
mouse stops the boot, or, if put on the machine after a successful boot,
it is not recognized. Some others here have been trying to help me figure
out the problem, but so far without success.
My conclusion - I will purchase the GA when it happens, just to reward
Security Systems for their faithfulness in keeping OS/2 going, but if it
is no more successful than the RC versions I will probably be using the
beta3 version for the foreseeable future. This is not the way to build a
good OS.
Clyde Stauffer
(OS/2 user since version 2.0 - 1993?)
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Evaulation of the RCs |
 |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:42:13 GMT |
IBM was supporting IBM hardware only, eComStation should work on all PC
models. Do you agree that this task is more complex?
Do you use ACPI driver? do you have HDAudio audio adapter in PC?
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Evaulation of the RCs |
 |
Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:35:51 -0400 |
Jim, typically the flaky behavior of Firefox can be attributed to the
Innotek Font Engine, Flash 5/7, or Java. Outside of that FF should be rock
stable, as it is on Windows, Linux, and OSX.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Evaulation of the RCs |
 |
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:24:07 GMT |
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:51:07 UTC, cstauffer@cinci.rr.com (Clyde
Stauffer) wrote:
> Now, as to RC4: My installation won't connect to the internet, and the USB
> mouse stops the boot, or, if put on the machine after a successful boot,
> it is not recognized.
Now that's bizarre. I had no end of trouble with eCS 1.2R (non-SMP).
It wouldn't do DHCP to save it's life. I could do anything I wanted
Internet-wise if I used Static IP, but DHCP just wouldn't work.
Several people attempted to help, but it never got resolved until I
decided to try RC4.
I also couldn't get a CD burned without errors, but I suspect there's
an issue with the ISO that's never been fixed. 5 DL's and 15 CDs
burned at various speeds never yielded an error-free CD.
RC4, however, has been nothing but good here. I even have a Novel 6.5
server here and it installed the NW client along with DHCP without any
problems. For some reason Firefox 2.0.0.11 is a little flakey (crashes
ocassionally for no reason and sometimes takes 2-4 restarts before it
stays up and running), but I can't say that I've loaded all my apps
back onto the system to fully test it.
|
| Post Reply
|
| Re: Evaulation of the RCs |
 |
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:21:15 GMT |
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:24:07 UTC, "Jim Nuytens" <no.spam@bite.me>
wrote:
...snip...
> I also couldn't get a CD burned without errors, but I suspect there's
> an issue with the ISO that's never been fixed. 5 DL's and 15 CDs
> burned at various speeds never yielded an error-free CD.
I don't think there is anything wrong with the ISO, unless you were
unlucky enough to have a problem, when you downloaded it. I have
burned many CDs, at full speed, without a problem. It seems that you
need to be lucky enough to have a good CD to burn to. CDs have got so
cheap, that the quality is the pits, and that is what causes the
majority of problems. If you have a DVD writer (and reader, of
course), you could try writing the ISO file to a DVD. They seem to be
slightly better quality. Also, be sure that you have CDs (or DVDs)
rated for data. The audio CDs are not as good, because in an audio
application, a few missing bits, here, and there, don't matter much.
Data, on the other hand, requires that every bit be correct, or you
can have wierd problems.
...snip...
> Obviously, YMMV.
Now that is an understatement of the facts...
--
From the eComStation 2.0 RC2 of Doug Bissett
dougb007 at telus dot net
(Please make the obvious changes, to e-mail me)
|
| Post Reply
|
|
|